Tale of a dumb son & A very vicious mother

Sonia Gandhi ,her son rahul and congress refuse to accept, they have been rejected by the voters in India, their behaviour out and inside the parliament is pure  and simple vicious, their overriding desire is to hurt Indians, damage India and blame the current dispensation for that.

Without taking any more time, I will leave it to the readers to view bothe videos uploaded and arrive at yheir own independent decision, I have no doubt there is going to be near unanimity in India, that congress and the dynasty is anti India , out to destroy this country.

June14th 2015 could easily be declared as the day media died In India. Since the morning arnab goswami of timesnow started screaming and yelling about mrs shushma swaraj helped lalit modi wuth travel document, nothing could have been further from truth than this assertion. The decibel levels steadily kept going higher and by evening it had reached a crescendo, with other channels pitching in and congress fishing in troubled waters. However the first document that timesnow. On 16th june 2015 in my postI had said there is no case made out and arnab , Timesnow and Congress would emerge looking foolish and would have hurt themselves severly. http://ioretradingindia.blogspot.in/2015/06/hysterical-reporting-by-arnab-of.html

''Sushma's act, a case of gross impropriety' - Rajya Sabha TV www.rajyasabhatv.com/sushmas-act-case-gross-impropriety.html Jun 18, 2015 - interview-rstv ... leader Anand Sharma pointed out to Sushma Swaraj's role in the Lalit Modi controversy. ... Sushma Swaraj's act is a case of gross impropriety. On the Lalit Modi controversy, Sharma criticised External Affairs ... Lat

LatSushma's act, a case of gross impropriety' - Rajya Sabha TV

www.rajyasabhatv.com/sushmas-act-case-gross-impropriety.html

Jun 18, 2015 - interview-rstv ... leader Anand Sharma pointed out to Sushma Swaraj's role in the Lalit Modi controversy. ... Sushma Swaraj's act is a case of gross impropriety. On the Lalit Modi controversy, Sharma cr

If one were to look back at recent events, it is obvious that it is not the Congress party, but Sonia Gandhi and Rahul who have been at the forefront of aggressive behaviour in parliament and outside. Yesterday, even taciturn Sonia rushed to the well of the house, showing her true nature. The disruptions during Sushma Swaraj's speech were often instigated by Sonia herself, and the sharp personal attacks - whether on Modi or Swaraj - were made by Rahul.
The rise of Modi's BJP is a direct threat to the Gandhi family's control of the Congress because it challenges the idea of the party as family property. Modi's unexpected rise, despite the forces ranged against him, demonstrate a simple point: that talented individuals can rise from nowhere to become No 1. Just as in business the Narayana Murthys and Sachin Bansals have challenged the hegemony of family-based businesses, in politics, Modi is the disrupter of family-based politics.
http://www.firstpost.com/politics/sushma-attack-in-parliament-focused-on-right-targets-india-needs-a-gandhi-mukt-cong-2390946.html
It is no surprise that Modi's tactics and strategies are now being copied by ambitious politicians everywhere - from Arvind Kejriwal, who abandoned his Aam Aadmi avatar to become AAP's sole face, to Nitish Kumar, and even Akhilesh Yadav in UP. All these leaders have realised that the people are looking for new leaders who can solve problems. Family-based parties are fine, as long as they seem to provide talented leaders with new ideas for India. At one point, even Kanshi Ram and Mayawati provided that new idea. This is exactly what the Congress party's First Family is afraid of - that talent will trump political inheritance at some point.
The Sonia-Rahul effort to disrupt parliament is driven by two fears - that if they do not lead the chaos, their party's most ambitious leaders could revolt and break off to form their own regional outfits (as Sharad Pawar and Mamata Banerjee did in the past). It should be more than obvious to anyone that young leaders like Jyotiraditya Scindia and Sachin Pilot are any day more capable than Rahul Gandhi, and the only thing holding them back is the reality that the Congress is currently Gandhi family property, and no one is allowed to outshine them.

The second fear of the Gandhi family is narrow and personal: they suspect that sooner or later, the real estate capers of Robert Vadra and Sonia and Rahul themselves (as evidenced in the National Herald property grab) will make them legally and politically vulnerable.

The "maa-beta" aggression is probably intended as a pre-emptive strike, so that in case the legal situation turns against them, they can claim political vendetta. Rahul Gandhihas already been muttering darkly about vendetta politics.

Has Dr. Kiran Bedi’s entry reduced Arvind Kejriwal’s political relevance.

Media more than Congress, wants to score an electoral victory over BJP, PM Modi and Hindu majority. Since 16th May 2014, media has been extremely shrill about everything and has been reporting only on negative incidents, if there is nothing then it has been manufactured like TimesNow did in the case of RohtakSisters. Or more recently Rajdeep Sardesai tried to incite others to heckle Mr. Arun Jaitley on 2002 riots.

After repeated victories in State Assembly elections, BJP seems well entrenched and growing stronger by the day. Media sensed an opportunity in Delhi Assembly Elections, because Aam Aadmi Party is the main pretender and not Congress, also perceived or real differences in the state Unit of BJP.

Media has been hyper active in promoting Arvind Kejriwal and Aam Aadmi Party. However all this came to a naught when Mr. Amit Shah surprised all by inducting and declaring Dr Kiran Bedi in BJP as its nominee for the post of Chief Minister of Delhi, beside many others who were erstwhile members of Aam Aadmi Party and Congress have also joined BJP.

This has reduced Arvind Kejriwal’s political stature to that of a pygmy in comparison to Dr. Kiran Bedi who scores over him on any and all parameters. Shazia Ilmi and Binny are also exposing Aam Aadmi Party’s fault lines. Arvind Kejriwal in the meantime is doing what he does best hurling baseless allegation and making tall claims.

All including media were confident they would best BJP at the hustings in Delhi, but this does not seem to be happening with new inductees in BJP.  Continued media focus is required by Arvind Kejriwal to stay in public memory, he challenged Dr.Bedi to a debate, as if on a cue all the channels and their prominent faces jumped up in unison and started making provocative statement to entice BJP into accepting this offer. These very people were the ones who had ridiculed Mr. L.K Advani when he had proposed a debate on similar lines in 2009.

Today Media wants it because they want to score brownie points, but don’t they do this in their studios every day, evening and night. NDTV and it’s people are complaining about new members of Censor Board they forget their silence when the most undeserving congress nominees have been members of this board since 2004. NDTV Hindi is blatantly promoting AAP by asking for RTs in favor of AAP.

Commie rag ironically called The Hindu wet it’s pants and apologized to Islamic Jihadis for publishing picture of people carrying copies of the French Magazine Charlie Hebdo. Very same publication which was preaching about movie PK to us!

In conclusion it’s distressing no MP in India came forward in support of Kashmiri Pandits as did Mr Bob Blackman MP who hosted an event at the House of Common.

'Internet Hindus' Culprits or Victims???

India:- Meet the 'Internet Hindus' : Rightwing tweeple and bloggers looking to rule social media.

It is a real achievement to get a fairly apolitical neo-Platonist who cares more about the Roman Empire than any present political entity to be annoyed about the spate of articles about “internet Hindus,” “trolls,” and the “Right wing.” But first, it was that Raman piece about NaMo and his trolls, and then a piece in the Hindustan Times, and now Global Post’s latest article, “Meet the Internet Hindus.” To be fair, this third piece is describing the phenomenon, and is far more objective than most twitter comments or the other two articles. In any case, let me make a few points clear to you moderns:  “Just for the Record”  Has more than fittingly dealt with this article by Mr. Jason Overdorf.

My take on this article is lacking on three counts 1.) Research 2.) Victims presented are the actual culprits  3.) Evidence presented has been ignored. 

Media in India is largely left leaning and has arrogated to itself many labels and rights including that of outrage. Moment we peel off one label we encounter another, its like the onion as you peel a skin the next one is there to contend with, only difference it’s not the viewer who has tears in his eyes, it’s the media which is whining while it wipes it’s tears. 

Deficiency of research is a major shortcoming in this article, not just this but maybe he is also unaware Indian media may probably be the only one in the world, which is in a state of conflict with its consumers. Ironic as it may seems it’s a hard fact. Print and Electronic media published comments convenient to them, edited some and totally ignored those which were critical as per the narrow definition of the media houses. This has been happening for over 10years. Blogs and Twitter have provided that section of the society a platform to air their views whose voice had been effectively throttled by the media houses.

Natural corollary is breaking down of the established secure order so enjoyed by all the media and its population. Blog and Twitter have exposed them to a counter narrative which has totally benumbed them all and hence the victim hood is the favored route.

Three individuals that Mr. Overdorf presents as victims are in fact the culprits. Sagarika Ghose, Barkha Dutt and Namita Bhandare are the ultimate ASS no don’t get your heckles up, all it means is “Attention Seeking Syndrome.”  

Lets deal with each of the victims so presented by the author.

Sagarika Ghose who proudly claims to have coined this term Internet Hindu is a typical case of a juvenile mind housed in an adult. How many of us have either experienced this or seen it happen, younger sibling who provokes the elder sibling get a whack in return and goes weeping to momma complaining about the elder sibling. The screen shots will prove that beyond doubt she provokes to attract attention.  These 10 screenshots were available to the author did he confront this so called victim. Why was the Tweet about Lord Ram a Divine Encroacher deleted by her. Lacks of conviction, courage or plain simple mischief making.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If she coins a name its but natural a counter will be there to it and she is the Media Jehadi, who lacks patience and ability to engage in a debate. Twisting Tweets and using fake interviews of Sri Sri Ravi Shanker are some other feathers in her cap. On the basis of this evidence doubt it if she can stake a claim to being a victim, on the contrary she is the Culprit who should have been removed from the organization for her unacceptable conduct. The issue is not just of this individual, but also the channel. She would have been sacked for her indiscretions which are a plenty in any other organization. Here she is protected due to her marital ties. 

 

Barkha Dutta has a serious problem of credibility ever since her role has been exposed by Radia Tapes. Her belief that public memory is short is just not holding true. Longer she stay higher is the degree of disgust with her. These screen shots will more than establish that she indulges in use of unacceptable language and if she get paid in full measure in return how can she claim to be victim. Inciting others who support her to indulge in abuse is also her way of life on Twitter. Calling those tweeters as guttersnipe who do not agree with her is definitely civil by her standards. Here again the issue is not just individual but the channel also.

 

 

    

 

Namita Bhandare is some one who had followed me on Twitter sometime last month, at the very outset I had informed her about my disposition towards the so called Journalists and forwarded to her the link to an article which was a rejoinder to her post in Hindustan Time, response was prompt unfollowing by her, not that it made any difference to me. The screen shots are self explanatory need one say who is abusive and who is the victim.

Here again the issue is that the publication and it’s personnel are biased and anti majority.

 

 

 

I have been on Twitter for over two and half years with over 104000 Tweet not one has been abusive or has been deleted because it was unacceptable. I am yet to encounter abusive Tweeters, do not contest the claims that there are abusive tweeters also, one has to deliberately invite them and this is what your so called victims have been indulging in.

Did these individuals present any evidence or their word was enough to classify them as victims. Did they describe what in their scheme of things was Liberalism? How they had the right to be called Liberal? While the only thing liberal about them that comes through is abusive and provocative language and actions.

Mr. Jason Overdorf cannot deny that @Sureshnakhua during the course of the interview with author did provide the evidence collated in the article  “Twitter a case of Fatal attraction or twitter a case of a sting in the tale (not tail)?"  Why it was overlooked is best explained by the man himself?

In conclusion wish a more thorough research had been done before writing the article. Finally as a tweeter 

@barbarindian has aptly stated “Media is a crime scene always take a screen shot.” 



Latest update on 17th Aug 2013
What particularly disturbs me is the way in which sections of the mainstream media and others in positions of power use the worst of what happens online to condemn all that happens online. One manifestation of this is the way in which the word “troll” has been appropriated by sections of the mainstream and redefined.  

Those in MSM who think all abusers n dissenters r "trolls" should read this.

Latest update on 27th Nov 2012

Latest update on 11th Nov 2012

 Latest update on 01st July 2012

 

I welcome a debate and discussion on this…As always, please keep your tone civil, your language polite…no sweeping generalisations please and no personal abuse.  Thank you.